|
Post by kinsm on May 27, 2015 19:07:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by kinsm on Jun 6, 2015 18:55:42 GMT -5
Who is the one person who picked below .400 ?
You might be a genius.
|
|
|
Post by huntforredsoctober on Jul 5, 2015 11:34:19 GMT -5
Guess I'm with the majority on this, thinking they'll end up with a record of 74 wins and 88 loses
|
|
|
Post by kinsm on Jul 6, 2015 22:10:21 GMT -5
MID-SEASON UPDATE:
With the win tonight the Reds (37-44) are on pace to win 74 games.
That should drop significantly if/when Cueto/Leake (and others) are traded and Lorenzen (and others) hit their inning limits.
With the exception of Philadelphia they could conceivably wind up with the 2nd worst record in the majors this year.
|
|
|
Post by kinsm on Aug 21, 2015 1:16:30 GMT -5
I think we were all too high.
|
|
|
Post by kramer1 on Aug 22, 2015 11:09:00 GMT -5
I picked 77-79. Damnit.
|
|
|
Post by kinsm on Aug 25, 2015 22:07:39 GMT -5
The Reds have lost 100+ games just one in franchise history, and they've never drafted 1st overall.
At the rate they're going they could achieve both of those.
The last time they were above .500 was back on May 14th when they had 18 wins and 17 losses on the season, since then they've gone 34 - 55 and have won just 4 of their last 20.
|
|
|
Post by kycatscinnreds on Aug 27, 2015 11:19:11 GMT -5
Who is the one person who picked below .400 ? You might be a genius. They might just be. Nice prediction
|
|
|
Post by kinsm on Sept 8, 2015 22:30:17 GMT -5
www.fangraphs.com/blogs/fangraphs-after-dark-chat-9815/Comment From Nolan: Which team would be the first to take a mulligan on this past off-season if given the chance? Jeff Zimmerman: Boston... Maybe the A’s Paul Swydan: I think the Red Sox and Padres would fight you to the death for that mulligan. I think the A’s would probably like a do-over on the Donaldson trade too. And oddly, the Mets. If they could go back and get Cespedes before the season started instead of Cuddyer, they might be salting the NL East away right now. Also, I would say the Reds would want a mulligan, but Jocketty may not realize this crappy season is all his fault, so…..
|
|
|
Post by kinsm on Oct 1, 2015 18:25:40 GMT -5
The Reds' last 13-game losing streak was in 1945.
|
|
|
Post by Dustrated on Oct 1, 2015 20:17:37 GMT -5
Turns out I was overly optimistic this year by saying 80 wins.
|
|
|
Post by ermahgerd on Oct 1, 2015 20:29:09 GMT -5
Who picked 89-91 wins? Make it stop. Who picked fewer than 64 wins??? The Reds won 66 games in 2001, but haven't won fewer than 66 since 1981. Worst year since before I was born? Ouch. Ermahgerd Prst of da Yer!
|
|
|
Post by redsfanman on Oct 2, 2015 0:00:00 GMT -5
Who picked fewer than 64 wins??? The Reds won 66 games in 2001, but haven't won fewer than 66 since 1981. Worst year since before I was born? Ouch. Ermahgerd Prst of da Yer! I still want to know, that person won the lottery.
|
|
|
Post by general on Oct 2, 2015 10:46:22 GMT -5
If you read Fanman's posts all season, you'd think the Reds won anywhere from 85-95 games.
|
|
|
Post by vtreds22 on Oct 3, 2015 19:57:13 GMT -5
I said 69-93, so I finished 2nd. Do I win a prize?
|
|