flash
Ted Kluszewski
Posts: 703
|
Post by flash on Jan 4, 2021 9:09:29 GMT -5
There was an interesting article on how the defensive shifts have forced batting averages down especially with left hand batters. Shifts against left-handed batters are used 50 % of the time according to stats.
On way to solve this problem would be to increase the infield playing space. If the foul lines were moved from their beginning from the Apex of the batter's box rather than 3/4 of the way across you could add about a foot of space the defense would have to cover which would make the 3b man moved more towards the third base bag rather than playing the shortstop position. You could expand it even more if the foul line were moved from a beginning midway down the outside of the batter's box. The baselines would however remain the same. Or you could eliminate foul territory all together for ground balls just as is done with foul flies. Some would say that would force the coach's boxes to be eliminated, but on a pop foul fly the fielder can already make the catch in the coaches box. A wild pitch or errant throw must already be covered by the fielder's Why not a batted ball.
|
|
|
Post by armo21 on Jan 14, 2021 21:12:59 GMT -5
Couldn't Players learn to "hit to all fields" or learn to bunt instead of trying to pull everything? I love when a team shifts and batters hit away from the shift. Take what the defense gives you. What is wrong with the shift? I think the problem with the game is that players are subscribing to launch angle, trying to hit everything hard in the air and striking out too much. There is too much one of 3 outcomes: K, BB, HR. Offense is now so boring. Get on base, don't make an out. Fans fell in love with the long ball and owners pay players who hit homers. I get that it is hard string a bunch of good at-bats together against modern day pitching staffs but maybe you move the mound back a foot or two?
|
|
|
Post by schellis on Jan 14, 2021 22:21:48 GMT -5
Shifts are getting extreme. I thing wrong with regular stuff but when it’s done to the point that it along with hitters are pushing the game into three true outcomes
|
|
searay
Bid McPhee
Posts: 1,122
|
Post by searay on Jan 15, 2021 19:11:50 GMT -5
Couldn't Players learn to "hit to all fields" or learn to bunt instead of trying to pull everything? I love when a team shifts and batters hit away from the shift. Take what the defense gives you. What is wrong with the shift? I think the problem with the game is that players are subscribing to launch angle, trying to hit everything hard in the air and striking out too much. There is too much one of 3 outcomes: K, BB, HR. Offense is now so boring. Get on base, don't make an out. Fans fell in love with the long ball and owners pay players who hit homers. I get that it is hard string a bunch of good at-bats together against modern day pitching staffs but maybe you move the mound back a foot or two? I agree. I can't see why these exceptional athletes can't learn to bunt and go against the shift. For that reason i see no reason for MLB to institute rules banning this defense
|
|
|
Post by schellis on Jan 15, 2021 20:06:45 GMT -5
Fans don’t want to see bunting
They want hard hit balls that result in action on the base paths.
I think if lefty power bats started to bunt in situations defenses would take it.
Walk hit into the shift or a weak single.
Baseball needs to find a way to get away from three outcome baseball or reds baseball last year.
I don’t think it’s a big ask that two fielders are on both sides of the bag.
|
|