|
Post by Lark11 on May 26, 2015 19:29:38 GMT -5
Like everyone else on here, I only have eyes for Christian. Oh, boy, he's got more than eyes for you. Does he ever... lol Did we ever get the back story on his avatar seduction gif?
|
|
|
Post by Yossarian on May 26, 2015 19:32:58 GMT -5
Oh, boy, he's got more than eyes for you. Does he ever... lol Did we ever get the back story on his avatar seduction gif? No. And...
|
|
|
Post by redskoolaiddrinker on May 26, 2015 19:39:27 GMT -5
3.46 I'll start believing he's destined for relief when he's over 4.50 for the season. 5.88 in May means he's regressing, not progressing. 3.46 is nice overall to this point, but that includes May's 1.04. I've watched him. He can't get through the opposition's lineup twice before they start to torch him now. He may be a decent bullpen arm after all. Too small of a sample size. Last seven games he's been at 4.15. We could do this all night. We don't know whether he's a starter or bullpen arm but he's a starter until he proves otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by kinsm on May 26, 2015 19:40:47 GMT -5
Lorenzen grabbed that with authority.
|
|
|
Post by redskoolaiddrinker on May 26, 2015 19:57:33 GMT -5
Lorenzen dealing tonight.
|
|
|
Post by vtreds22 on May 26, 2015 20:45:38 GMT -5
He got torched against SanFran. The start before he went 7 innings and the start after he went 6. Only 4 runs total in those two starts. Not enough evidence yet that says he can't be a starter. 5.88. I'll start believing when he starts dealing. His overall ERA is 3.46. His FIP is 3.99. His WHIP is 1.23. His ERA+ is 112. There is absolutely nothing that suggests that he can't be a ML starter at this point in his career. Using a one month sample size to support your claim is misguided at best.
|
|
|
Post by walstib on May 26, 2015 20:48:45 GMT -5
Lorenzen dealing tonight. Don't get too excited, Lorenzen did it against that power house Colorado lineup. Some of you are easily impressed. I want to see consistency before I anoint him a capable major league starter. Some of you guys have got to stop drinking the front office and Brian Price's kool-aid.
|
|
|
Post by walstib on May 26, 2015 20:53:26 GMT -5
5.88. I'll start believing when he starts dealing. His overall ERA is 3.46. His FIP is 3.99. His WHIP is 1.23. His ERA+ is 112. There is absolutely nothing that suggests that he can't be a ML starter at this point in his career. Using a one month sample size to support your claim is misguided at best. What is his FIP, his WHIP, his ERA+, his BA with greater than 50+ blonds in section 104 on Tuesday night games in May when his ERA has been 5.88?
|
|
|
Post by walstib on May 26, 2015 20:54:42 GMT -5
5.88. I'll start believing when he starts dealing. His overall ERA is 3.46. His FIP is 3.99. His WHIP is 1.23. His ERA+ is 112. There is absolutely nothing that suggests that he can't be a ML starter at this point in his career. Using a one month sample size to support your claim is misguided at best. Misguided, no. Regression, yes. He is a reliever.
|
|
|
Post by vtreds22 on May 26, 2015 20:57:16 GMT -5
His overall ERA is 3.46. His FIP is 3.99. His WHIP is 1.23. His ERA+ is 112. There is absolutely nothing that suggests that he can't be a ML starter at this point in his career. Using a one month sample size to support your claim is misguided at best. What is his FIP, his WHIP, his ERA+, his BA with greater than 50+ blonds in section 104 on Tuesday night games in May when his ERA has been 5.88? Do his April numbers not count?
|
|
|
Post by Yossarian on May 26, 2015 20:58:25 GMT -5
What is his FIP, his WHIP, his ERA+, his BA with greater than 50+ blonds in section 104 on Tuesday night games in May when his ERA has been 5.88? Do his April numbers not count? No. It was still early. Those numbers don't actually count.
|
|
|
Post by vtreds22 on May 26, 2015 20:58:57 GMT -5
His overall ERA is 3.46. His FIP is 3.99. His WHIP is 1.23. His ERA+ is 112. There is absolutely nothing that suggests that he can't be a ML starter at this point in his career. Using a one month sample size to support your claim is misguided at best. Misguided, no. Regression, yes. He is a reliever. Again, there is literally nothing that suggests he can only be a reliever at this point in his career. I hate to break it to you, but just because you believe something doesn't make it true.
|
|
|
Post by psuhistory on May 26, 2015 21:05:53 GMT -5
Do his April numbers not count? No. It was still early. Those numbers don't actually count. What about when it gets late early?
|
|
|
Post by Yossarian on May 26, 2015 21:10:01 GMT -5
Misguided, no. Regression, yes. He is a reliever. Again, there is literally nothing that suggests he can only be a reliever at this point in his career. I hate to break it to you, but just because you believe something doesn't make it true. I believe my parents love me and Kramer secretly wants to date me. What are you saying?
|
|
|
Post by vtreds22 on May 26, 2015 21:15:36 GMT -5
Again, there is literally nothing that suggests he can only be a reliever at this point in his career. I hate to break it to you, but just because you believe something doesn't make it true. I believe my parents love me and Kramer secretly wants to date me. What are you saying? I'm not sure if Kramer has been keeping it much of a secret.
|
|