|
Post by walstib on May 26, 2015 18:34:24 GMT -5
...I believe all will ultimately be bullpen arms. The Reds have NO starter prospects.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2015 18:38:16 GMT -5
...I believe all will ultimately be bullpen arms. The Reds have NO starter prospects. Desclafani and Lorenzen will be starters. How effective who knows. I think Iglesias at this point is up in the air. Stephenson may never reach majors he may be huge bust time will tell. Moscot will be a big league starter IMO.
|
|
|
Post by redskoolaiddrinker on May 26, 2015 18:50:53 GMT -5
...I believe all will ultimately be bullpen arms. The Reds have NO starter prospects. You forgot about Howard. But what about Moscot, Travieso, and Romano? What makes you think DeSclafani is not a starter?
|
|
|
Post by walstib on May 26, 2015 18:58:07 GMT -5
Desclafani can't get through a line-up twice before he's tagged. 5.88 ERA in May. I thing he'd be a decent bullpen arm. So do the pundits who observe and write about baseball for a living.
|
|
|
Post by walstib on May 26, 2015 19:02:14 GMT -5
The Red's have made a habit of drafting pitchers high who were relievers in college/HS and trying to turn them into starters. Why? Because they think their arms have less miles on them? Or, because they think they can sign them for less?
|
|
|
Post by Lark11 on May 26, 2015 19:05:09 GMT -5
The Red's have made a habit of drafting pitchers high who were relievers in college/HS and trying to turn them into starters. Why? Because they think their arms have less miles on them? Or, because they think they can sign them for less? Because they thought they were the best available players when the picks rolled around.
|
|
|
Post by redskoolaiddrinker on May 26, 2015 19:10:41 GMT -5
Desclafani can't get through a line-up twice before he's tagged. 5.88 ERA in May. I thing he'd be a decent bullpen arm. So do the pundits who observe and write about baseball for a living. He got torched against SanFran. The start before he went 7 innings and the start after he went 6. Only 4 runs total in those two starts. Not enough evidence yet that says he can't be a starter.
|
|
|
Post by walstib on May 26, 2015 19:13:17 GMT -5
Desclafani can't get through a line-up twice before he's tagged. 5.88 ERA in May. I thing he'd be a decent bullpen arm. So do the pundits who observe and write about baseball for a living. He got torched against SanFran. The start before he went 7 innings and the start after he went 6. Only 4 runs total in those two starts. Not enough evidence yet that says he can't be a starter. 5.88. I'll start believing when he starts dealing.
|
|
|
Post by walstib on May 26, 2015 19:16:30 GMT -5
The Red's have made a habit of drafting pitchers high who were relievers in college/HS and trying to turn them into starters. Why? Because they think their arms have less miles on them? Or, because they think they can sign them for less? Because they thought they were the best available players when the picks rolled around. I know that choosing players to draft can be a crap shoot, but maybe the Reds should indulge in deeper thought.
|
|
|
Post by Lark11 on May 26, 2015 19:23:24 GMT -5
Because they thought they were the best available players when the picks rolled around. I know that choosing players to draft can be a crap shoot, but maybe the Reds should indulge in deeper thought. I think drafting college relievers with an eye towards moving them into the rotation becomes less defensible the earlier the pick. I wasn't wild about Nick Howard in the first round last year.
|
|
|
Post by redskoolaiddrinker on May 26, 2015 19:24:12 GMT -5
He got torched against SanFran. The start before he went 7 innings and the start after he went 6. Only 4 runs total in those two starts. Not enough evidence yet that says he can't be a starter. 5.88. I'll start believing when he starts dealing. 3.46 I'll start believing he's destined for relief when he's over 4.50 for the season.
|
|
|
Post by Yossarian on May 26, 2015 19:24:57 GMT -5
I know that choosing players to draft can be a crap shoot, but maybe the Reds should indulge in deeper thought. I think drafting college relievers with an eye towards moving them into the rotation becomes less defensible the earlier the pick. I wasn't wild about Nick Howard in the first round last year. Oh, but he's crazy about you, Lark. I've seen the way he eyes you!
|
|
|
Post by Lark11 on May 26, 2015 19:26:19 GMT -5
I think drafting college relievers with an eye towards moving them into the rotation becomes less defensible the earlier the pick. I wasn't wild about Nick Howard in the first round last year. Oh, but he's crazy about you, Lark. I've seen the way he eyes you! Like everyone else on here, I only have eyes for Christian.
|
|
|
Post by Yossarian on May 26, 2015 19:27:51 GMT -5
Oh, but he's crazy about you, Lark. I've seen the way he eyes you! Like everyone else on here, I only have eyes for Christian. Oh, boy, he's got more than eyes for you. Does he ever...
|
|
|
Post by walstib on May 26, 2015 19:28:53 GMT -5
5.88. I'll start believing when he starts dealing. 3.46 I'll start believing he's destined for relief when he's over 4.50 for the season. 5.88 in May means he's regressing, not progressing. 3.46 is nice overall to this point, but that includes May's 1.04. I've watched him. He can't get through the opposition's lineup twice before they start to torch him now. He may be a decent bullpen arm after all.
|
|